| |
AEROSPACE TRAINING INNOVATION FUND EVALUATION MATRIX
The ATI evaluation team uses this matrix to evaluate your application, according to deliverables set by our contract with the Government of British Columbia.
Criteria |
1
(poor) |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5
(good) |
Weight |
Total |
Does the training retain, create, upgrade jobs, including increasing competitiveness of company or developing new capabilities to enter new markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Company is involved in Manufacturing, Process or MRO |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Investment including trainees wages and in-kind. |
 50
|
60 |
70 |
80 |
90 |
2 if
> 70% |
|
Timing is within eligible dates. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Provides designation, credential or other certification that is recognized within industry as a desirable achievement. |
|
|
x 2 |
x 2 |
x 2 |
1 |
|
SME – based on # of employees |
<500
|
300
|
100
|
50
|
10
x 2 |
1 |
|
Deliverables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training is relevant to trades/technical career in aerospace. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training will assist in creating environment of lifelong learning for employees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training involves non-traditional sources of apprentices or trainees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases access to training; includes creating new training capabilities within company. |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Training will help improve company revenues and create opportunities for additional training in the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
TOTALS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum score is 100. Proposals must exceed 65 to be approved.
Notes:
- If a company’s investment exceeds 70% of the total project cost, rating score should be multiplied by 2.
- ‘Accredited Documentation’ and ‘SME’ elements are key thrusts of the program. Where rating score of either or both of these elements is 5, (not less than 5), multiply that score by 2.
- Maximum score for all elements, using all weighting factors is 100. A total score of 65 points or more is required for the proposal to be approved.
|
|
